βRepublicans are actively trying to destroy democracy through gerrymandering, voter suppression, and undermining elections when they lose.β
Both parties gerrymander β Maryland and Illinois are among the worst. Voter ID is supported by 80% of Americans including majorities of every racial group. Questioning election results isn't new either β Democrats challenged the 2000, 2004, and 2016 results.
Key Talking Points
- 180% of Americans support voter ID including 62% of Democrats and 87% of nonwhite voters (Monmouth, 2021)
- 2Both parties gerrymander β Maryland, Illinois, and New York maps were struck down or graded F for Democratic gerrymandering
- 3Democrats objected to Electoral College certifications in 2001, 2005, and 2017
- 4Proposals to pack the Supreme Court and abolish the Electoral College aim to change the rules, not protect them
The Full Response
The claim that one party is uniquely threatening democracy requires selective memory. Let's look at the specific charges.
On gerrymandering: both parties do it aggressively wherever they hold state legislatures. The Brennan Center for Justice has documented extreme gerrymandering by both parties. Maryland's congressional map, drawn by Democrats, was so distorted that a federal court struck it down in 2022. Illinois Democrats drew maps that the Princeton Gerrymandering Project graded as an F for partisan fairness. New York's Democratic legislature had its maps thrown out by the state's highest court. Gerrymandering is a bipartisan problem, not a Republican one.
On voter ID: a 2021 Monmouth University poll found that 80% of Americans support requiring photo ID to vote, including 62% of Democrats and 87% of nonwhite respondents. The idea that voter ID is suppression implies that minority voters are uniquely unable to obtain identification β a premise that is itself patronizing. India, the world's largest democracy, requires voter ID for 900 million voters. Most European democracies require it. The U.S. is an outlier in not requiring it universally.
On questioning elections: this is not a Republican invention. Democrats objected to Electoral College certification in 2001 (after Bush v. Gore), 2005 (after Bush's reelection), and 2017 (after Trump's win). Hillary Clinton called Trump an "illegitimate president" in 2019. Stacey Abrams refused to concede the 2018 Georgia governor's race for years. Democratic leadership spent three years promoting the theory that the 2016 election was swayed by Russian collusion, which the Mueller report did not establish.
Meanwhile, Democratic leaders have openly discussed packing the Supreme Court, eliminating the Electoral College, abolishing the filibuster, and adding new states specifically to gain Senate seats. These are proposals to change the fundamental rules of American governance when the existing rules produce outcomes they dislike.
Democracy is resilient precisely because both parties compete within an established framework. Accusing your opponents of destroying democracy whenever they use legitimate political tools is itself corrosive to democratic norms.
How to Say It
Acknowledge that gerrymandering is a real problem β just not a one-party problem. Use the voter ID polling data to show this isn't a fringe position. Keep the focus on the double standard rather than defending every Republican action.
Sources β The Receipts
- β’
- β’
- β’
Community Responses
Have a great response to this argument? Share it below. Approved responses appear for everyone.