βConservatives are always on the wrong side of history. You opposed civil rights, women's suffrage, and every social progress movement.β
Republicans led the abolition of slavery, passed the 13th-15th Amendments, and voted for the Civil Rights Act at higher rates than Democrats. 'The right side of history' assumes history moves in one direction β but Prohibition, eugenics, and communism were all once 'progressive.'
Key Talking Points
- 1Republicans passed the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments; first Black Congress members were all Republican
- 219th Amendment received 91% of Republican House votes vs. 59% of Democratic votes
- 3Eugenics, Prohibition, and communism were all 'progressive' movements that history judged harshly
- 4European countries are now reversing progressive youth gender medicine policies (UK Cass Review, Sweden, Finland)
The Full Response
The phrase "wrong side of history" assumes that history moves in a single, predetermined direction toward progressive values. This is a philosophical assertion, not a fact β and history itself repeatedly disproves it.
First, the conservative record on civil rights is far stronger than this claim suggests. The Republican Party was founded explicitly to oppose slavery. Republicans passed the 13th Amendment (abolishing slavery), the 14th Amendment (equal protection), and the 15th Amendment (voting rights) with near-zero Democratic support. The first Black members of Congress were all Republicans. Republican President Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to desegregate Little Rock schools and signed the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960. As noted elsewhere, a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
On women's suffrage, the 19th Amendment was first introduced by a Republican senator (Aaron Sargent) in 1878. When it finally passed in 1920, it received 91% of Republican votes in the House versus 59% of Democratic votes. The first woman elected to Congress was Republican Jeannette Rankin in 1916.
Now, about that arc of history. Many movements that were considered "progressive" turned out to be catastrophic. Eugenics was embraced by the leading progressives of the early 20th century, including Margaret Sanger and prominent academics. Prohibition was a progressive crusade. Communism was championed by Western progressives as the future of civilization β and produced 100 million deaths in the 20th century according to "The Black Book of Communism." Lobotomies won a Nobel Prize. History doesn't move in a straight line toward the views currently held by the American left.
Some things that are considered "progressive" today may be viewed very differently in 50 years. The explosion of youth gender medicine, for example, is already facing backlash across Europe, with the UK's Cass Review recommending major restrictions. Sweden and Finland have pulled back on pediatric gender treatments. What looks like the "right side of history" today may look like reckless experimentation tomorrow.
Conservatism, at its core, is about epistemic humility β the recognition that human institutions embody accumulated wisdom, and that rapid, radical change often produces unintended consequences. Sometimes the most courageous position is resisting the crowd, not joining it.
How to Say It
Don't get into a defensive crouch. Go on offense with the actual history, then challenge the assumption that history moves in one direction. The eugenics and Prohibition examples are powerful because they show progressive consensus being dead wrong.
Sources β The Receipts
- β’
- β’
- β’
Community Responses
Have a great response to this argument? Share it below. Approved responses appear for everyone.