βThanksgiving is a celebration of the genocide of Native Americans. It whitewashes history and should be a day of mourning, not celebration.β
The first Thanksgiving in 1621 was a genuine harvest celebration shared between Pilgrims and Wampanoag. Later treatment of Native Americans was often terrible, but Thanksgiving itself commemorates gratitude and cooperation β not conquest. Rewriting the holiday erases a real moment of cross-cultural goodwill.
Key Talking Points
- 1The 1621 Pilgrim-Wampanoag feast is documented in primary sources and was a genuine cooperative celebration
- 2Lincoln established modern Thanksgiving in 1863 as a day of national gratitude during the Civil War β not to celebrate conquest
- 3Over 90% of Americans celebrate Thanksgiving across all racial and ethnic backgrounds, per Pew Research
- 4Teaching full Native American history and celebrating Thanksgiving are not mutually exclusive
The Full Response
The claim that Thanksgiving "celebrates genocide" conflates the specific historical event β the 1621 harvest feast β with the broader and often tragic history of European-Native American relations. These are connected but distinct subjects, and collapsing them serves political purposes more than historical accuracy.
The 1621 event at Plymouth is documented in primary sources, including Edward Winslow's contemporary account. The Pilgrims and roughly 90 Wampanoag, led by Massasoit, shared a three-day harvest celebration. This was not a myth β it was a real event reflecting genuine cooperation. The Wampanoag had helped the struggling Pilgrims survive, teaching them agricultural techniques suited to the region. The relationship between the Plymouth colonists and the Wampanoag was complex but largely cooperative for decades.
The subsequent history of European-Native American relations includes genuine atrocities β King Philip's War, the Trail of Tears, broken treaties, and forced assimilation policies. These deserve honest reckoning and are not served well by being reduced to a hashtag or folded into a holiday critique. The suffering was real and specific, and it deserves specific historical attention, not rhetorical deployment.
The modern Thanksgiving holiday, as established by Abraham Lincoln in 1863 during the Civil War, was explicitly about national gratitude and unity β not about celebrating conquest. Lincoln proclaimed it to give thanks during the nation's darkest period and to express hope for reconciliation. The holiday has evolved into a celebration of family, gratitude, and community that resonates across all cultural backgrounds.
According to a 2023 Pew Research survey, Thanksgiving remains one of America's most popular holidays, celebrated by over 90% of Americans across racial and ethnic lines. For most Americans, it is about gathering with family and expressing gratitude β not about endorsing historical injustice.
It is entirely possible β and appropriate β to celebrate Thanksgiving while also teaching the full, complex history of Native American-European relations. Creating a false choice between gratitude and historical honesty serves neither goal. We can honor Native American history and acknowledge past wrongs without destroying a holiday that brings Americans together around shared values of gratitude and generosity.
How to Say It
Show genuine respect for Native American history and suffering β don't be dismissive. Argue that Thanksgiving celebrates gratitude and cooperation, and that honoring Native history is compatible with keeping the holiday. Avoid being defensive about colonialism.
Sources β The Receipts
- β’
- β’
- β’
- β’
Community Responses
Have a great response to this argument? Share it below. Approved responses appear for everyone.