“Australia banned guns and mass shootings stopped. Why can't we do what works?”
Australia's gun buyback collected about 650,000 guns. A University of Melbourne study found no statistical evidence it reduced homicides. Australia's homicide rate was already declining before the ban, and the U.S. homicide decline over the same period was actually larger — without a ban.
Key Talking Points
- 1Melbourne Institute: no statistical evidence the buyback reduced firearm homicides
- 2U.S. gun homicides dropped 49% in the same period — without a ban
- 3UK gun crime increased 89% in years following their handgun ban
- 4Brazil and Mexico have strict gun control with 3-5x higher murder rates than U.S.
The Full Response
Australia's 1996 gun buyback after the Port Arthur massacre is the go-to example for gun control advocates. But the evidence that it actually reduced violence is far weaker than most people realize.
The Australian government collected approximately 650,000 firearms — about 20% of the estimated civilian supply. A study by the University of Melbourne's Melbourne Institute found 'no evidence of a statistically significant impact of the buyback program on firearm homicide rates.' Australian homicide rates were already declining before the buyback and continued declining at roughly the same rate afterward.
Critically, during the exact same period (1996-2014), the United States experienced a larger decline in gun homicide rates than Australia — without any comparable gun ban. U.S. gun homicides dropped about 49% from 1993 to 2014, while gun ownership increased dramatically. If Australia's ban caused their decline, what caused America's larger decline without a ban?
The UK banned handguns after the 1987 Hungerford and 1996 Dunblane massacres. In the years immediately following, gun crime in England and Wales actually increased by 89%, peaking in 2003-2004, before gradually declining. The ban didn't prevent an increase in gun crime.
Brazil has extremely strict gun control, with most civilian gun ownership illegal. Its murder rate is 4-5 times that of the United States. Mexico has essentially one legal gun store in the entire country, run by the military. Its homicide rate is roughly triple that of the U.S.
Cultural, economic, and social factors drive violence far more than the availability of a particular tool. The U.S. has unique challenges — gang violence, drug trade, income inequality, mental health crises — that aren't solved by restricting the tool while ignoring the underlying causes.
If the goal is reducing violence, look at what actually works: targeted policing of high-crime areas, gang intervention programs, swift prosecution of gun crimes, and addressing the root causes of violence.
How to Say It
Lead with the Melbourne Institute study — it's Australian research, not American gun lobby talking points. The parallel U.S. decline is your strongest comparison. Don't dismiss their concern about mass shootings — acknowledge the tragedy while challenging the proposed solution.
Sources — The Receipts
- •
- •
- •
Community Responses
Have a great response to this argument? Share it below. Approved responses appear for everyone.